Perioperative Pain Assessment

analgesia assessment pain Feb 27, 2025

On a Scale of 0 to 10…. 🩺

Pain is a unique and subjective experience 🧠, thus making it extremely difficult to measure in an objective manner. Acute pain assessment in the perioperative environment happens on a daily basis βš•οΈ, utilising a variety of different assessment methods πŸ“ and tools πŸ› οΈ in order to provide a successful pain management plan πŸ’Š. Here are some of the key factors for a thorough perioperative pain assessment:

Pre op assessment:

🩺Does the patient have a history of chronic pain?
πŸ’‰If yes, establish the nature and location of the pain
πŸ”΄ What (if any) is their baseline level of pain? 

πŸ’Š What (if any) is their analgesia regime, and have they had their usual pain medications?

🦠 Has the patient had multiple surgeries? These patients are at a higher risk of developing chronic or prolonged post-surgical pain ⚠️, particularly if the surgeries are performed on the same area, e.g., multiple abdominal procedures.

Intra-op assessment:
Under general anaesthesia πŸ›οΈ, pain assessment is guided by physiological response to surgical stimuli πŸ”¬. Close monitoring of vital signs, in particular:
❀️ Heart rate
πŸ’‰ Blood pressure
🌬️ Respiratory rate

This data will help to guide analgesia requirements throughout the procedure πŸ› οΈ.

Post-op assessment:
Post-operative pain assessment in the recovery room can be challenging to perform πŸ˜“ and can change rapidly in a short period of time. The key to a thorough pain assessment is to account for information received from the pre and intra-op assessments πŸ“Š, then collect post-op information using a variety of different assessment tools 🧰:

Numeric rating scale (NRS):
We all know this one πŸ“ - “using a scale of 0-10, how would you rate your pain? 0 being nothing, ten being the worst pain you have ever experienced.”
This tool is useful in determining the intensity of pain πŸ”₯, and also provides an objective scale to determine the effectiveness of analgesia that has been administered πŸ’Š.

Functional Assessment Score (FAS):
The FAS provides an indication of limitations to a patient’s function caused by pain as observed by the clinician πŸ‘¨‍βš•οΈ. Functional activity expectations need to be tailored to suit the patient’s condition πŸ›Œ, and in the setting of the recovery room, this would generally be based on a patient’s ability to deep breath and cough 🀧, or to shuffle themselves comfortably/sit up for limb surgeries 🦡.

Talk to your patient!
Gather descriptive information from your patient πŸ—£οΈ, such as what the pain feels like (e.g. burning πŸ”₯, shooting 🧨, throbbing ❀️‍🩹), where the pain is located πŸ“, its duration ⏰ and triggers ⚠️, and so on. This information can help to detect any potential abnormalities or concerns πŸ‘€:

🦴For example; a wrist ORIF patient that feels a tight, pressure-type pain under their cast may need a surgical review πŸ₯ - imagine if you had just treated their numerical rating and not questioned the type of pain!!

 πŸ˜£A patient may be in distress, however, the pain is mainly associated with their chronic lower back pain πŸ’₯ (from lying flat on the operating table for hours) and they are not really concerned with the surgical pain πŸ€•.

For patients who are culturally and linguistically diverse 🌍, or for those with cognitive impairment 🧠, other behavioural tools should be used to assess pain, such as the FACES scale 😷, or the PainAD scale.

Remember, pain is an extremely complex and highly unique experience πŸ˜– - there is no such thing as a “non-painful” procedure βœ‹, and everyone experiences things differently 🀷‍♀️. You should never discount a patient’s pain 🚫, and everyone has the right to receive high-quality pain management πŸ’‰.

Build Knowledgeβœ…
Improve Safetyβœ…

References:

ACSQHC (2024) Quality statement 2 - Acute pain assessment

https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/clinical-care-standards/opioid-analgesic-stewardship-acute-pain-clinical-care-standard/quality-statements/quality-statement-2-acute-pain-assessment

Adeboye, A., Hart, R., Senapathi, S. H., Ali, N., Holman, L., & Thomas, H. W. (2021). Assessment of Functional Pain Score by Comparing to Traditional Pain Scores. Cureus, 13(8), e16847. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16847

Stay connected with news and updates!

Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
Don't worry, your information will not be shared.

We hate SPAM. We will never sell your information, for any reason.

Want to keep learning?

Want more content like this? Check out our premium membership for exclusive content.Β 

Click Here for Access

Β 

Β 

Join our mailing list for free weekly educational content.

Β 

By entering your details you consent to receiving amazing educational materials and updates about our products and events.